- Emulation - Taqleed 54
- Tahara 241
- Rules of Water 5
- Use of Lavatory 9
- Ablution 64
- Ghusl 70
- Ghusl of Janaba 26
- Ghusl of Menstruation 12
- Ghusl of Istihadha 1
- Ghusl of Lochia - Nifas 3
- Death Related Issues 24
- Recommended Ghusl 4
- Tayammum 11
- Najis Things 60
- Purification 22
- Prayers 224
- Daily Prayers 59
- How to Perform the Prayers 71
- Friday Prayers 10
- Prayers of Signs 2
- Qadha Prayers 14
- Congregational Prayer 39
- Defects and Doubts 4
- The Prayers of the Traveler 16
- Recommended Prayers 9
- Fasting 89
- Fasting Intention 1
- Things which Invalidate the Fast 21
- Things that do not Invalidate the Fast 5
- Disliked Things during Fasting 4
- Failure to Fast 8
- The Kaffara for Breaking the Fast 16
- Validity of Fasting 11
- Fasting Exemption 3
- The Crescent 1
- Making up the Lapsed Fast 8
- Rulings of Fasting 9
- I’tikaf 2
- Khums 65
- Zakat 16
- Unlawful Earnings 47
- Enjoining the Good and Forbidding the Wrong 2
- Buying & Selling 20
- Banking 12
- Interest-Riba 11
- Ahlulbait 38
- Beliefs 71
- Clothing, Appearance & Adornment 40
- Man & Woman 24
- Divorce 51
- Marriage 217
- Introduction 16
- Etiquettes of Marriage 19
- Marriage Contract 10
- The Guardian 25
- Prohibited Matrimony 45
- Temporary Marriage 63
- Conditions of Marriage 5
- Dower 7
- Marital Duties 6
- Children 15
- Financial Maintenance 6
- Eid 11
- Food & Drink 43
- Dance 3
- Holy Quran 26
- Blood Donation 2
- Human Cloning 2
- Inheritance 10
- Islamic Religion 24
- Masturbation 15
- Medical Issues 22
- Imam Mahdi 16
- Immigration 1
- Games 7
- Alcohol 14
- Hijab 22
- Magic 6
- Istikhara 9
- Jesus (Peace be upon him) 2
- Chess 4
- Music & Songs 23
- Narrations 11
- Parents 13
- The Prophet - Peace be upon him- 8
- Quran Commentary 8
- Religious Chants 6
- Religious Propagation 9
- Repentance 9
- Shaving & Beard 11
- Slavery 1
- Smoking 6
- Stealing 3
- Suicide 2
- Supplication-Dua 21
- Tattoos 5
- Tran Sexuality 4
- Vivisetion 1
- Vow , oath , Covenent 9
- Wilayet Alfaqih 3
- Will 3
- Work 26
- X-ray 0
- Ziyara 6
- Yoga 1
- Charity 4
- Copyrights 2
- Moon Sighting 3
- Pilgrimage 32
- Organ Donation 2
- Satan 2
- Leasing 3
- Mourning Imam Hussein 29
- Backbiting 3
- Lottery 4
- Laws 2
- Converts 7
- Mosques 7
- Islam & Christianity 1
- Relationships 13
- General Issues 23
- Pets 7
- Sport 2
- Internet 7
- Lost Property 5
- Kaffarah 3
- Lending & Borrowing 6
- Gifts 4
- Hunting and Slaughtering 19
- History 2
- Usurpation 1
- Religious Endowment (Waqf) 6
- Agency 1
- Compensation (Diya and Dhaman) 8
One person tells me to proof your belief in the imamate of the Ahlulbait (peace be upon them) by the Quran.
The imamate of the Ahlulbait (peace be upon them) can be proven from the holy Quran by a number of ways.
- "Your guardian can be only Allah, and His messenger and those who believe, who establish worship and pay the poor due while bowing down (in prayer)". (Quran 5:55). This verse was revealed because of the incident of the payment of Imam Ali (peace be upon him) to the charity - his ring - while he was bowing in prayer. The verse joined his guardianship to the guardianship of the messenger of Allah, which is the leadership of the Muslim nation i.e. the imamate.
- "Nor does he speak of (his own) desire" (Quran 53:3). The verse indicates that what the Prophet says is from Almighty Allah. The orders of the Prophet were to follow his household when he said in this commonly known narration: I leave among you the two weighty things, the book of Allah and my progeny; as long as you are attached to them both, you will never be misguided". The Prophet also ordered us to follow Imam Ali in the famous narration of Ghadeer: "Whosoever's master I am, Ali is his master". In another narration, the Prophet said: "Ali is your master after my demise," and many more narrations.
How can we prove Imamate from the Quran? If Imamate is such a backbone for Shia Islam and we believe that if one does not accept the Wilayah of Imam Ali (peace be upon him), he is a looser, then why did not Allah mention this directly in the Holy Quran, thus major disputes could be avoided? How do we answer the objection that there is no proof about the Imamate of Imam Ali (peace be upon him) being essential?
This question presents important issues that require an explanation, since this is one of the most important fallacies that the enemies of the Ahlulbait present.
We would like to draw your attention to important issues in order to clarify the truth:
Firstly: Doubting the Imamate of the Ahlulbait just because it is not mentioned in the Holy Book is in reality doubting the truthfulness of the Messenger of Allah and belittling his position in being an essential source of religious laws and a speaker of the truth and correctness, which in turn raises a big question on the credibility of Islam as a religion and the Holy book as a divine text that "Falsehood cannot come at it from before it or from behind it," as the Quran states clearly. But rather, the Quran itself presents the Messenger of Allah and his conduct as the truth that is not associated with any falsehood, misguidance and forgetfulness. When Almighty Allah stated that, "Nor does he speak of (his own) desire. It is naught save an inspiration that is inspired," (Quran 53:3-4) and also, "And whatsoever the Messenger gives you, take it. And whatsoever he forbids, abstain (from it)," (Quran 7:59). And also "But nay, by thy Lord, they will not believe (in truth) until they make thee judge of what is in dispute between them and find within themselves no dislike of that which thou decides, and submit with full submission." (Quran 65:4)
Based on this, a Muslim should research about Imamate as well as the position of the Sunnah in its regards, just as he looks for the position of the Sunnah with respect to the religious obligations like the prayers, the fast, pilgrimage and the like, as these essential obligations are not mentioned in the Holy Book with detail, but the Sunnah explained the ways to perform them.
It is sufficient to prove the Imamate by referring to the trusted books of narrations of the Sunnis, like the book of Bukhari and the book of Muslim and all the authenticated books in which they included narrations of the Prophet (peace be upon him) that state in a clear way referring to the leadership of the Ahlulbait after the Prophet, like when he said: "Whosoever's master I am, Ali is his master." Also: "Ali is your wali (leader) after me." And also when he said to Ali (peace be upon him): "You are to me like Aaron was to Moses, but there is no prophet after me," and the like in innumerable narrations. There are other narrations that relate to the religious authority of the Ahlulbait (peace be upon them) in general, like: "I am leaving among you two weighty things: the Book of Allah and my household; as long as you are attached to them both, you shall never be misguided.
Secondly: there are verses of the Holy Quran which, as the narrations indicate, were revealed in respect of Imam Ali (peace be upon him). They are narrated by Muslims. They also indicate in a clear way the Imamate of Imam Ali (peace be upon them) like when Almighty Allah said "Your guardian can be only Allah; and His messenger and those who believe, who establish worship and pay the alms, and bow down (in prayer)." (Quran 55:5) And even the verse: "Obey Allah, and obey the messenger and those of you who are in authority." (Quran 59:4) They indicate in a clear way that those in authority whose obedience is necessary are infallibles since - based on the verse - one should obey them as one obeys Almighty Allah and likewise the Messenger of Allah, and nobody fulfills this condition except the Imams of the Ahlulbait, whom Almighty Allah purified them in a thorough purification as per the verse 33:33. Furthermore, Muslims have unanimously agreed on the righteousness of the Imams of the Ahlulbait, their highness, the strength in their faith, the knowledge in the affairs of religion, as this clearly appears to the individual who looks at their history and biography. Could any Muslim accept that Almighty Allah would order Muslims to obey those in authority by applying this title on everyone that assumes power, whether he does this by force or through inheritance, even if he committed crimes like Yazeed bin Moawiyah and similar despots? Are the aforementioned verses not sufficient in proving the imamate of the Ahlulbait from the Quran for the fair-minded searcher for the truth?
Thirdly: what you have mentioned, that if the Holy Quran had named Imam Ali (peace be upon him) clearly as the successor to the Prophet (peace be upon him and his progeny) there would be no conflict between Muslims, is not correct. There are a number of verses that clearly describe certain rulings, and, despite that, Muslims did not agree on them; an example of such a case is the verse of ablution in which the way of performing ablution has been clearly explained, and there is no doubt that the verse is clear in its meaning when it was revealed, and the Messenger of Allah used to perform it repeatedly in the presence of Muslims. Despite all this, there was a difference in opinion in understanding it. Another example is the verses of divorce which indicate that if the divorce is pronounced three times in one place and time it is not considered as three divorces by which a man cannot return to the wife, but some Muslim jurists regard this type of divorce as valid and a man cannot return to his wife thereafter, while this is invalid according to the verses of divorce. There are many other such examples in jurisprudential issues, although all Muslims base their conclusions on the Holy Book. Furthermore, if one looks in the biography of the Prophet, he could clearly conclude that some of his companions were not obeying him or even respecting him properly. They used to dare to disobey him and not care about his orders; it is sufficient to mention some incidents from the trusted books of narrations of the Sunnis:
(1) Most of the Muslims fled from a number of battles that were led by the Messenger of Allah, like Uhud, Hunain and Khaiber, whereas the Holy Book states clearly the prohibition to do so and that whoever does so will be punished in Hell for eternity. Almighty Allah said: "Whoso on that day turneth his back to them, unless manoeuvring for battle or intent to join a company, he truly hath incurred wrath from Allah, and his habitation will be hell, a hapless journey's end."(Quran 16:8)
(2) What took place during the "tragedy of Thursday": Abdullah bin Abbas - as it is narrated in the Sunni books of narrations like the Musnad of Ahmad - ; said, weeping: "The day of Thursday! And what day was Thursday!! The Messenger of Allah said to us: "Bring to me a broad bone [to be used to write on] and ink, so I may write for you something that you shall not be misguided after it is written." Umar said: "The Messenger of Allah is babbling." In some of the narrations, they were arguing; some of them were in favor of Umar and some others were saying, "Bring for the Messenger of Allah what he asked for." The Messenger of Allah said then: "Leave me!! There should not be a fight in my presence."
From the said incident one can conclude that the refusal of the Prophet to write what he wanted to write was to preserve the dignity of Prophethood, since it is not appropriate for the Prophet to order for something in a clear and direct way and Muslim differ in their opinions whether to obey him or not, since there should be no dispute after the order has been issued.
From this, one can conclude the reason why the name of Imam Ali (peace be upon him) was not mentioned in the Holy Book, Almighty Allah knew that there were some people who wanted to rule and were ready to disobey Allah and His Messenger in an open way, and they had their supporters who were willing to help and encourage them. If the Holy Quran was to mention Imam Ali's name then they would doubt the Holy Book in the same way as they have doubted the Messenger of Allah. This would result in the rejection of the Holy Book, which would then not be Allah's continuous proof.
Why did Almighty Allah appoint Imams?
Almighty Allah appointed the Imams to guard the religion and protect it from misguidance and to continue the message of Islam that started with the prophethood of Prophet Mohammad (peace be upon him and his household) for mankind. People did not obey Allah's orders in this matter due to their desire to possess authority and to be in control. This led to tragedies amongst Muslims for centuries until they separated into different sects and were controlled by the infidels. Almighty Allah said: "And if the people of the townships had believed and kept from evil, surely we should have opened for them blessings from the sky and from the earth. But (unto every messenger) they gave the lie, and so we seized them on account of what they used to earn" (7:96).
What is the relevance of the concept of Wilayat (authority) of the Imams in our lives today?
We can comment on your question by stating the following:
1. The Imamate of the Imams of the Ahlulbait (peace be upon them) has been legislated by Almighty Allah for people to observe. Every Muslim must obey all that has been proven to be divinely legislated obligations without considering the immediate benefit of the law on his everyday life since believing in a religion is believing in all what is proven to be part of it.
2. Believing in the Wilayat of the Ahlulbait (peace be upon them) is following them and observing their teachings. This has a great effect on the way a believer deals with day-to-day matters based on the teachings and the guidelines that originate from them. We can see that amongst the characteristics of the followers of the Ahlulbait by which they are known today is their condemnation of terrorism against innocents especially children, women and old people, and this is not but a reflection of their attachment with the humane teachings of the Ahlulbait (peace be upon them) in dealing with those who disagrees with them.
As we know Imamate is a divine position that cannot be taken away by anybody. With that in mind, when Imam Ali (peace be upon him) said that his right of the caliphate was taken from him, what does he mean, because he remained the religious authority regardless of what they did? So what exactly was taken away from him, because the true believers were still following him?
What you said is true. Imamate is a divine position that cannot be taken by anyone. The application of this right is represented by the management of the affairs of people with justice according to the divine rules of Almighty Allah, and since Imam Ali (peace be upon him) was not able to exercise this right of authority for some time, we can say that the ruling and management of the affairs of people based on religious standards was taken from him.
Can one be considered a Shia if he does not say the third testimony in Athan since it is testifying the belief in Imam Ali as the successor of the Prophet (peace be upon them)?
The third testimony in the Athan does not affect one's belief. Shiasm is the belief in the leadership - Imamate - of Imam Ali (peace be upon him) and the Imams among his descendants. Athan could indicate this belief.
I am researching about Shia Islam. My wife is Sunni and is not interested in studying Shia Islam. I want to know if she is still considered a Muslim.
Islam is submitting with the two testimonies. Iman depends on believing in the Wilayah of the Ahlulbait (peace be upon them).
Are the Imams of Ahlulbait (peace be upon them) superior than the prophets (peace be upon them) of Allah?
There are several narrations which indicate that the prophets (peace be upon them) were interceding to Almighty Allah by the five Infallible (The Prophet, Imams Ali, Hassan, Hussain and Fatima the daughter of the Prophet). Other texts indicate that their Nour preceded the creation of everything else in glorifying the Almighty Allah. This is an indication of their superiority over the rest of the creation.
Many people in our society have a faith that Imam Ali (Peace be upon him) is superior to Prophet Muhammad (Peace upon him and his progeny). So what is the truth?
This is a big fabrication and can not be accepted. There is no doubt in the narrations of the Ahlulbait that the Prophet (peace be upon him) is better than all mankind and the superiority of the Ahlulbait over mankind is based on their relation to him and being the closest ever to him in their action and lifestyle. It is enough to refer to this narration that Al -Kulaini reported to clear this fallacy: "A man asked Imam Ali (peace be upon him): When was your Lord existing? Imam replied: "When was He ever absent so one could ask: when he existed". The man then asked the Imam: O Prince of devotees, are you a prophet? Imam replied by saying: "Woe to you, I am only one of Mohammad's slaves".
How can the infallibility of the Imams (peace be upon them) be proven? Are there traditions in Sunni books which inform us about the Imams and their names? Is denial of the religious leadership of the Imams tantamount to disbelief?
Shia Muslims prove the infallibility of their Imams (peace be upon them) in various ways; some are logical, and others are from the Holy Quran and the traditions of the Prophet (peace be upon him and his holy progeny). The books of beliefs state these proofs clearly. Many narrations from Sunni and Shia books of traditions mention that the Imams are twelve, without mentioning their names.
Many narrations in the Shia books of traditions mentioned the names of the Imams (peace be upon them).
Whoever does not believe in any of the twelve Imams - when the evidence is established to him - will be punished on the Day of Judgment, but this does not take him outside Islam or to be considered as an infidel.
What is the philosophy of Infallibility? Is it true that the Shia believe that the Prophet and the Imams (peace be upon them) cannot make mistakes?
There is no dispute amongst the followers of the Ahlul-bait (peace be upon them) that the Prophets and the Imams are sinless, in such a way that they do not commit what opposes the religion. Our scholars have explained in their books of beliefs the evidences to prove this concept. There is no doubt that the Prophet and the Imam are appointed by Almighty Allah. He has ordered people to follow them. So, if it is possible for them to commit sins, they might order people to do so as well and people have to follow them. So their orders would not be trusted to be from Almighty Allah, and He will not order us to follow somebody who can misguide us. Similarly, they are to be taken by their followers as role models. If they were to commit sins, others will be encouraged to do the same.
Did the Imams (Peace be upon them) claim to be infallible?
There is no doubt that the followers of the Ahlulbait (peace be upon them) base the belief in the infallibility of the Imams (peace be upon them) on solid sources, starting from verse 33:33. Other texts indicate this directly and sometimes indirectly. As an example, it was reported in Ziyarat ul Jamiaa which was narrated by Imam Ali Al-Hadi in an authentic way: "Allah has guarded you from lapses and saved you from attractions (of life, Satan, etc)".
I want to know what is the authenticity status of the advice of Imam Ali (peace be upon him) mentioned in Letter 31 in Nahjul Balagha? Some people say that some part of the letter is from an unauthentic chain of narrators? Others say that the whole letter is unauthentic. What are your views regarding this?
The said letter is not different from the rest of the letters found in Nahjul Balagha. The doubt about the authenticity of the letter may come from the fact that this letter includes advises directed to Imam Hassan (peace be upon him) which raises the question about the need of the young Imam to such directions although he is infallible.
Apparently, the said doubt is not valid since this way of presenting the advice could be for the sake of reminding the person and repeatedly giving him the advice. The Quran used this way when Almighty Allah said: "And warn, for warning profits believers." (51:55). Also it could be part of indirect guidance to all Muslims by directing the advice to Imam Hassan (peace be upon him). This way is also mentioned in the Holy book as well. Almighty Allah said: "And cry not unto any other god along with Allah. There is no Allah save Him. Everything will perish save His countenance. His is the command, and unto Him ye will be brought back." (28:88). It is a given that a Prophet would not worship anyone but Almighty Allah.
Could the Infallibles (peace be upon them) do Tark e Aula (the less preferred deed or decision)?
The necessary infallibility is not based on doing preferred deeds, so there is no rational prevention that stops the Infallible (peace be upon him) from doing less preferred deeds but this does not mean that it actually takes place.
Some people are calling Imam Ali (Peace be upon him) as their creator and sustainer. What do you thing about this?
This belief is invalid and it is not of the Shia scholars. Shia religious scholars have agreed that the Imams (peace be upon them) are created slaves of Almighty Allah. He created them like He created everybody else. The religious narrations of the Imams themselves confirm this truth. Yes, there is no doubt that the Imams showed miracles, like the prophets (peace be upon them). Almighty Allah said with respect to Jesus (peace be upon him): "I come unto you with a sign from your Lord. Lo! I fashion for you out of clay the likeness of a bird, and I breathe into it and it is a bird, by Allah's leave. I heal him who was born blind, and the leper, and I raise the dead, by Allah's leave. And I announce unto you what ye eat and what ye store up in your houses."(3:49)
Why do we say "Ya Ali Madad"? Is it proven by Islamic teachings?
This phrase refers to seeking intercession to Almighty Allah by Imam Ali (peace be upon him). Intercession is one of the Islamic concepts that verses from the holy Book and narrations of the Prophet and the Imams of the Ahlulbait (peace be upon them all) indicate.
If a believer prefers to seek help and assistance from Almighty Allah by saying Ya Allah Madad instead of Ya Ali Madad, is it correct to say that he has expressed enmity to the 14 Infallibles in general and to Imam Ali (peace be upon him) in particular and he is no more a Shia?
There is nothing wrong with seeking the mercy directly from Almighty Allah and seeking the intercession of Imam Ali (peace be upon him), since the matter entirely is in the hand of Allah. Seeking the intercession of Imam Ali means asking Almighty Allah by the intercession of Imam Ali, so the chances of one's wishes being answered is greater than directly asking Almighty Allah.
Some people believe that Imam Ali (peace be upon him) divides and delivers livelihood. Is such a belief permissible in our faith?
There is no doubt that the presence of the Imam (peace be upon him) has its blessings and great effects on the welfare of mankind other than his role as the guide of people. Many narrations indicate such existence of blessings, like what is reported in some phrases of the Ziyaratul-Jamia.
What do you have to say about "Nadi Ali" that involves calling on Imam Ali (peace be upon him)?
The said is not a supplication to Imam Ali (peace be upon him) in the place of supplicating to Almighty Allah. Rather, it is seeking intercession from Imam Ali (peace be upon him) with the permission of Allah. So it is permissible; rather, it shows the recognition of the Godly power, as well as an expression of the belief in the Wilayah of the Imam and his high position to Almighty Allah.
It is claimed by some that Imam Ali (peace be upon him) offered prayers in congregation led by Abu Bakr. Is this true?
We are not aware of a historical source that clearly indicates this, but offering the prayer behind Abu Bakr does not give legitimacy to his caliphate. Imam (peace be upon him) no doubt was forced to give the allegiance to Abu Bakr. He did so because those people were ready to kill whoever does not pay allegiance. They killed Sa'ad bin Abadah because he did not agree with them although he left Medina and migrated to Syria and did not resist them. This clearly shows that they were willing to do anything in order to be in power. From this, one can conclude that Imam Ali (peace be upon him) was forced to get along with them. It is not far to consider that such prayers - if it really happened - made them confident that the Imam (peace be upon him) was not acting against them.