Becoming A Mujtahid
Question :

When I go to study in Najaf, then what do I have to study to become a Mujtahid?

Answer :

Ijtihad is not a goal that a student should have from the beginning. A believer should aim to fulfill the religious responsibilities of upholding the orders of the Sharia; one of them is learning the Islamic laws and teaching them. This could be achieved by learning more about the religion – and not necessarily reaching the level of Ijtihad – by which a believer could serve the Right Path. One could serve the religion and be a role model amongst his society, family and friends by being obedient to the Islamic laws and by spreading the religious teachings in the areas where he resides.
Ijtihad is a talent that can be achieved by studying with the guidance of Almighty Allah. A religious student should study hard and make use of his time as much as possible. If he achieves this, then he can thank Almighty Allah for this bounty. If he does not, he can still serve the religion.

Different Laws of Sharia
Question :

Do Mujtahids differ in the laws of the prayer? For example one tells us to pray this way and another tells us to pray another way?

Answer :

It is natural to have different derivations as people differ in their understanding of a single text, whereas the Mujtahids deal with numerous texts, plus the fact that as time passes further away from the time of the texts, fallacies and probabilities increase. From this, the mission of a Mujtahid becomes harder and his responsibility becomes greater in protecting the religion in a correct way and to the greatest possible extent. The oppressors and the liars throughout the times have made obstacles for us in obtaining the truths from the Imams (peace be upon them) which made the mission of the Mujtahids more difficult. Therefore some variations are to be expected.

Difference in Edicts
Question :

According to another Marja synthetic alcohol is Tahir and it is allowed to use perfume containing such alcohol; however, Sayyed Al-Hakeem considers alcohol as Najis. Both of them are Marjas of Taqleed, so why are their verdicts opposite? I am following Sayyed Al-Hakeem, so what should I do?

Answer :

The difference in deriving the laws between religious jurists naturally originates from their difference in understanding the religious texts or considering some of them over the others. His Eminence, Sayyid Al-Hakeem (may Allah prolong his life) sees that alcohol is Najis, if it is an intoxicant and naturally liquid. Based on this, the prayer is invalid if the praying person’s body or clothes came in contact with it.
So if you follow his Eminence, the mentioned law should be observed.

Difference of Opinion
Question :

There are sometimes differences of opinion amongst the Marjas. For one Marja taking some money – for example, by way of winning a prize in a lottery – will be unlawful, and according to another Marja taking it will be lawful. What is the reason of these differences? Secondly, if I take this money, according to my Marja who has allowed it, and on the Day of Judgment it becomes known that the verdict of my Marja was wrong and the others were right, how will this be judged?

Answer :

It is natural to have a difference of opinions amongst the scholars of any field, not just Fiqh. This is based on a number of factors, particular to each field. The layman has to act upon the edicts of the Marja he is following, and Allah will excuse him if his Marja was not correct.

Incorrectly Recalled Edicts
Question :

If one quotes an edict of a Marja for somebody else, and later realizes that he has recalled incorrectly, is it obligatory upon him to inform the person?

Answer :

It is obligatory to inform the misinformed person if the latter is expected to act upon it.

The Edicts of the Marja
Question :

If my Marja allows something, is it permissible for me to encourage others to do it even though other Marjas have different opinions on the matter?

Answer :

It is not permissible to encourage them to disobey the verdict of the Marja that they follow in a way that the call to act a certain way is with the awareness that it is against the verdict of the Marja that they emulate.
If someone asks about the ruling of a particular issue without intending to know the verdict of his Marja or he does not have one to follow, then it is permissible to inform him of the ruling that is according to your own Marja.

Laws of the Sharia
Question :

If people do not follow any religious jurist, Marja and asked about any laws of the Sharia, can I give an answer based on the edicts of my Marja, without mentioning that there are other opinions?

Answer :

In this case, it is permissible for one to answer based on the edicts of his own Marja, and he does not need to give a reference of the source of the edicts or mention that there are other opinions of other scholars.

The Edicts of My Marja
Question :

Am I allowed to present the edict of my Marja whenever I am asked a jurisprudential question?

Answer :

If the person who asks you does not intend to know the edict of a particular Marja. you may tell him the opinion of your Marja

Traditions of the Ahlulbait
Question :

I came across many traditions of Imams of the Ahlulbait (peace be upon them) about Ghusl, Purification and Ablution in an authentic book. These traditions are being highly descriptive and specific about fundamental things in Fiqh. Is it permissible for me to follow the rulings of imams (peace be upon them) about the aforementioned things and follow the ruling of my Marja in other matters that cannot be found in traditions through authentic sources?

Answer :

You should follow the scholar that reached the level of Ijtihad and fulfills all the other conditions of the Marji, since the derivation of the religious verdicts from the traditions require a great amount of knowledge and experience, and the religious jurists are those who have the experience and knowledge that they gain from full time learning of these particular subjects.

Non-Shia Muslim
Question :

Is it permissible for Non-Shia Muslims to make use of your edicts (fatwas) without becoming Shia Muslims?

Answer :

Our edicts are based on the jurisprudence of the Imams of the Ahlulbait and the narrations that reached us in authentic ways which all Muslims are required to act upon, since the Prophet (peace be upon him and his holy progeny) ordered the nation of Islam to refer to the Ahlulbait and follow them in the famous well-known narration that is reported by numerous ways in the books of Shias and Sunnis: "I leave among you the two weighty things, the book of Allah and my progeny; as long as you follow both of them, you will never be misguided".
Acting upon this narration and other narrations to follow the Ahlulbait is not obligatory on the Shias only, but it is an obligation on all Muslims.

Commiting an act which the Marja deems to be prohibited
Question :

If a person commits an act which his marja deems to be prohibited, and on Judgment Day it is discovered that the act was not actually a sin after all, will this person not be punished for it since the act was not prohibited? Or will he get punished because he disobeyed the edict of his marja?

Answer :

The said person is not considered as disobedient, but is liable for proceeding to commit an act that he was informed to be a sin. An example of this is if a person drinks from a glass thinking it to be wine, but it turns out to be water.